Showing posts with label new technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new technology. Show all posts

what is a Micro Air Vehicle?

The term, Micro Air Vehicle, may be somewhat misleading if interpreted too literally. We tend to think of flying model aircraft as "miniature", so the term "micro" now alludes to a class of significantly smaller vehicles. But MAVs are not small versions of larger aircraft. They are affordable, fully functional, militarily capable, small flight vehicles in a class of their own. The definition employed in DARPA's program limits these craft to a size less than 15 cm (about 6 inches) in length, width or height. This physical size puts this class of vehicle at least an order of magnitude smaller than any missionized UAV developed to date.

MAVs should be thought of as aerial robots, as six-degree-of-freedom machines whose mobility can deploy a useful micro payload to a remote or otherwise hazardous location where it may perform any of a variety of missions, including reconnaissance and surveillance, targeting, tagging and bio-chemical sensing.

Although the 15 cm limitation may appear somewhat arbitrary, it derives from both physics and technology considerations. To fully appreciate the scale implications, we can compare this class of vehicle with other familiar systems, as in Figure 1. This is a plot of vehicle gross weight vs Reynolds number. The Reynolds number (a measure of size multiplied by speed) is perhaps the most useful single parameter for characterizing the flight environment. The smallest current missionized UAV is the "Sender", developed and operated by the Naval Research Laboratory. Sender boasts a 4 foot wing span and weighs only 10 pounds - impressive specifications for its near 100 mile range capability. MAVs are an order of magnitude smaller and may display a wide variety of configurations, depending on specific mission requirements.

The Micro Air Vehicle Flight Regime Compared to Existing Flight Vehicles

The low Reynolds number regime is significant in that it projects a fundamental shift in physical behavior at MAV scales and speeds - an environment more common to the smallest birds and the largest insects. While naturalists have seriously studied bird and insect flight for more than half a century, our basic understanding of the aerodynamics encountered here is very limited. Neither the range - payload performance of bees and wasps nor the agility of the dragonfly is predictable with more familiar high Reynolds number aerodynamics traditionally used in UAV design. And if our understanding of low Reynolds number effects is limited, our ability to mechanize flight under these conditions has been even more elusive.

With the small size of the MAV comes high surface-to-volume ratios and severely constrained weight and volume limitations. The technology challenge to develop and integrate all the physical elements and components necessary to sustain this new dimension in flight will require an unprecedented level of multifunctionality among the system components. The traditional "stuffing the shell" paradigm of conventional aircraft design is not likely to be workable for MAVs.

Yet to be developed, Micro Air Vehicles will be roughly one-tenth the scale of the Sender, and the weight of a six-inch, fixed-wing MAV may be only 50 grams or so, just one one-hundredth the weight of the Sender. Figure 2 illustrates the difference in size. Yet MAVs must be capable of staying aloft for perhaps 20 to 60 minutes while carrying a payload of 20 grams or less to a distance of perhaps 10 km. Finding high density sources of propulsion and power is a pivotal challenge. And while the Sender is a conventional, moderate aspect-ratio, fixed-wing aircraft, MAVs may require more unusual configurations and approaches ranging from low aspect-ratio fixed wings to rotary wings, or even more radical notions like flapping wings.

Size Comparison Between an MAV Concept Vehicle and a Small UAV

'air car'

A GROUP of six mechanical engineering students in Andhra Pradesh have successfully converted a traditional fuel-driven car into to an air-car which runs only on pure air. The students from Christu Jyoti Institute of Technology and Sciences at Jangaon in Warangal district, have successfully demonstrated the new technology which uses the principles of air pressure. N Joy Kumar, the leader of the group said that they converted an existing diesel/petrol run car in to an “air-Car”.

“The principle in this technology is that it sends pressurised air into a cylinder which provides the piston movement and runs the motors,” said Joy Kumar, who was led and supervised by Puli Ravi Kumar, an assistant professor at the National Institute of Technology, Warangal. The project was financed by the authorities of CJIT.

“This technology focuses on conversion of air pressure energy into mechanical force,” said Ravi Kumar. The vehicle does not have a radiator as it does not involve any combustion. “It is totally pollution-free and environment-friendly,” said Joy Kumar.

This group of mechanical engineers has already obtained a patent to this technology and they will continue to make improvements on the technology. “We expect to bring out a full-fledged model next year,” Joy Kumar said.

Why I quit Reliance Money?

· Comparatively twice the delay in opening account initially. Took 20+ days.

· Inconvenient security token

o Without security token you can’t trade.

o It creates inconvenience and discomfort more than security

· Poor trading portal

o Trading portal is not compatible with Firefox or Opera.

o In Internet explorer (IE6/IE7/IE8), it stuck most of the time. You need to re-login again and again.

o JVM installation is also required

· Poor customer service

o No response to emails most of the time

o Otherwise it will take many days to get an email response

o To email them, you need to login to very uncomfortable email account of Reliance Money Mail (Now associated with hotmail)

o No TOLL FREE Number for support. All major share brokers have toll free no. for cust.care

o When an unauthorised tele-trade occurred in my account, they simply said they can’t do anything on the matter. (Case ref:1606762)

· Inconsistent tariff – Always increasing

o They increased the AMC from Rs.50 to Rs.200, i.e. 400% increase

o Limit card turnover limit decreased from 5 lakh to 2 lakh for PR-500. i.e. 60% increase in effective brokerage

o Rs.15 additional charge was introduced per trade for limit card users